


"Victims or Agents? Female Cross-Border
Migrants and Anti-Trafficking Discourse”
Lucinda Peach, Associate Professor in the Department
of Philosophy and Religious Studies at American University
Tuesday, March 7, 2006
4:00-6:00, Mason Hall D3 A & B
Co-Sponsored by the Cultural Studies Program and the Department of
Environmental Sciences and Policy.
In recent years,
scholars and NGOs taking a human rights approach to human trafficking have
lodged a variety of criticisms at the failure of existing governmental and
international frameworks established to counter the trafficking in persons.
There has been a good deal of discussion and debate about the most appropriate
way to conceptualize both human trafficking and the persons who are trafficked.
In general terms, governments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
advocating the abolition of the prostitution and sex work that are the basis of
sex trafficking have viewed the subject of trafficking as an innocent victim.
In contrast, governments emphasizing an immigration control approach have been
more inclined to concentrate on the traffickers and consider trafficked persons
only tangentially and then primarily as illegal aliens. Still again,
international human rights organizations have tended to focus on trafficked
persons as individuals who have had their rights violated, and who require
protection (and usually repatriation to their country of origin), rather than
considering the global social, economic, and political contexts that promote
human trafficking.
Recently,
feminist critics of these approaches have articulated an alternative strategy
to place the female cross-border migrant at the center of the analysis of sex
trafficking and other forms of women’s migration. At first glance, this seems
to be a progressive move towards empowering women and protecting their human
rights, especially those who have been trafficked for the sex trade and/or have
otherwise migrated for work in the sex industry. However, in this paper, I
contend that putting the cross-border migrant subject into the center of
trafficking analysis also creates new problems for anti-sex trafficking
efforts, especially as they relate to the formulation and implementation of law
and public policy. I will first discuss some of the factors that favor putting
the female migrant subject at the center of anti-trafficking analysis, such as
its recognition of and respect for trafficked persons. I will then discuss some
of the problems that such a reconfiguration would entail, especially with
respect to legislation relating to the trafficking of children and unwilling,
involuntary victims of trafficking as well as the demand side of sex trafficking.
I will conclude with some recommendations for how trafficking analysis might be
modified to take better account of the specific needs and interests of all
trafficked persons.
Peach
is an Associate Professor in the Department of Philosophy and Religion at
The Center for
Global Ethics and its Director Carol Gould invites George Mason faculty, staff,
students and friends to join us for The Afternoon Lecture Series featuring
distinguished intellectuals working in the area of Global Ethics. Discussion
and lite
refreshments will follow each of our speakers' presentations. Please feel free
to bring your lunch.